From: owner-scribes@castle.org (scribes digest) To: scribes-digest@castle.org Subject: scribes digest V3 #21 Reply-To: Sender: owner-scribes@castle.org Errors-To: owner-scribes@castle.org Precedence: bulk scribes digest Wednesday, October 4 2000 Volume 03 : Number 021 ======================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with unsubscribe scribes-digets in the body of the message. Leave the subject line blank. Do not include any additional text. [scribes]: Illuminated Alphabet colors - clarification Re: [scribes]: Illuminated Alphabet colors [scribes]: Beginning library Re: [scribes]: Beginning library Re: [scribes]: Beginning library [scribes]: Brown ink ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 11:52:14 -0500 From: Lori Martell Subject: [scribes]: Illuminated Alphabet colors - clarification >Sorry for the confusion factor. And, I went back and looked at the >original request this morning (I got confused as the original was at work >and I answered last night from home), and it was for white work not white >vine. But, it did spark some great interactions . Ok, I posted the original so *I* went back and checked what my befuddled brain typed :) What I wanted was white vine work - the Italian interlace stuff :) but you are right, that's not really what I typed. I apologize for the mix up but heck! I've gotten some really good notes out of the discussion :) Sorry folks, I'll try to be more clear next time :) Aldiana Northshield, Midrealm =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:56:38 -0700 From: Carolyn_Richardson@cch.com Subject: Re: [scribes]: Illuminated Alphabet colors >>The only gilding on the page was some decorative bars going the length of the border. The dots inside the colored sections were actually yellow paint (similar to a canary yellow) in the green and red portions, and white in the blue ones. The green was a very strong green, not minty like Mistletoe is. << I don't think that Mistletoe Green looks "minty" at all, Katarina. It certainly can if you add white to it, but straight out of the tube it's pretty pure. >>Another wonderful source for white vine work is a book I purchased years ago called: "Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis," published under the venue of the<< I'd also recommend locating a copy (now out of print) of "Biblioteca Corvinianus" - I don't have the rest of the information on it with me right now. But this book has lots of leaves from the former collection of King Mathias of Hungary who apparently hired nearly every Italian illuminator to do books for him at one point. LOTS of full page examples of white vine work, including some quite unusual ones. >>I hope this helps anyone else who is doing white vine. By the way, there is only the slightest suggestion of a light brown wash as "shading" on one of the edges of the vines in the Pliny book. I don't recall if this was present in the book I viewed at The Newberry. The putti in the Newberry manuscript were heavily shaded with brown, however.<< I think the putti tended to be painted in a more naturalistic style than the vines themselves. As to the "faded" or "brown" controversy, please note that in my original note I did say that the ink may have been "too light" to begin with. I really find it hard to believe that most of the calligraphers *wanted* brown ink rather than black inks, and I've never heard anyone suggest in writing or practice that they deliberately made their inks sepia or brown. Yes, different recipes will give you different results in color, but I still think they were aiming for black whenever they could get it. But we all know how predictable these things can be. As to whether they faded - yes, I do think some of the inks have faded, particularly in some of the antiphonal pages I've seen. The manuscripts don't seem to have suffered from that particular problem since they were normally kept closed. Antiphonals were frequently left open on the music stands and while I don't see them often, the ones I suspect have faded were not in museums so they're difficult to document. I've seen them at antiquarian shows (less frequently) or antique shows (fairly frequently). I do recall seeing one many years ago at the Long Beach antique swap market - - half the page was in a fairly black ink (not real black, but certainly darker than sepia) - the other half was brown/sepia. Since it was like this "per pale" on the page it was pretty obvious that it wasn't because of different colored inks. I don't know how old the fading was - it could have happened at any time in the page's life and this was from the late 15th century so it had 500 years to do it. There wasn't that much illumination on it so it's hard to tell what happened to the colors (and most of the good illumination was on the faded side), but the reds were faded in the same pattern - they were almost invisible on the faded half. The dealer wanted way too much money for it or I'd have bought it as an example of "what not do do" with such things. Tetchubah of Greenlake =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 13:19:41 -0500 From: Linda Carey Subject: [scribes]: Beginning library Good afternoon; Please forgive this posting, as I'm sure this question has been asked before, but I've just finished my first original scroll, and I'm looking to broaden my illumination library. I have the Illuminated Alphabet by Seligman, and would love to get more. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. In service to the Dream, Lady Seannach Mac Lochlainn Trimaris =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 13:47:14 -0400 From: Elizabeth Blatt Subject: Re: [scribes]: Beginning library At 1:19 PM -0500 10/4/00, Linda Carey wrote: >Good afternoon; > >Please forgive this posting, as I'm sure this question has been asked >before, but I've just finished my first original scroll, and I'm looking >to broaden my illumination library. I have the Illuminated Alphabet by >Seligman, and would love to get more. Any advice would be greatly >appreciated. > What kind of books are you looking for? How-to ones, historical surveys of MSS? Elianora =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:51:23 -0400 From: "Laura Peskett" <2rozakii@home.com> Subject: Re: [scribes]: Beginning library > Good afternoon; > > Please forgive this posting, as I'm sure this question has been asked > before, but I've just finished my first original scroll, and I'm looking > to broaden my illumination library. I have the Illuminated Alphabet by > Seligman, and would love to get more. Any advice would be greatly > appreciated. > > In service to the Dream, > Lady Seannach Mac Lochlainn > Trimaris Any books by Janet Backhouse are great. I also use my Illuminated Manuscripts by Christopher de Hamel a lot. Both have a nice selection of different periods in them. Lady Tzitzakion Barony Beyond the Mountain, East Kingdom P.S. I love the Illuminated Alphabet. I think it is a great book for showing the steps on creating different styles, as well as gives great hints and tips. Definitely a great beginners book! =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 17:51:19 +0000 From: Randy Asplund Subject: [scribes]: Brown ink Carolyn_Richardson@cch.com wrote: > As to the "faded" or "brown" controversy, please note that in my original > note I did say that the ink may have been "too light" to begin with. I > really find it hard to believe that most of the calligraphers *wanted* > brown ink rather than black inks, and I've never heard anyone suggest in > writing or practice that they deliberately made their inks sepia or brown. > Yes, different recipes will give you different results in color, but I > still think they were aiming for black whenever they could get it. But we > all know how predictable these things can be. > Tetchubah of Greenlake Actually, black is a harsh color and so I think that the reason for using thiner brown ink for underdrawing, layout of ruling lines, and especially soft color drawing of white vine, is a perfectly reasonable artistic choice. RanthulfR - -- Randy Asplund (734) 663-0954 Science Fiction and Fantasy Illustration 2101 S. Circle Dr., Ann Arbor, MI. 48103 See a Universe of art ranging from Medieval Manuscripts to Star Trek and Magic: The Gathering at: http://www.provide.net/~randyaf =================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, send email to with a blank Subject: line and unsubscribe scribes in the body of the message. Do not include any additional text in the body. ------------------------------ End of scribes digest V3 #21 ****************************