From: owner-scribes@castle.org (scribes digest) To: scribes-digest@castle.org Subject: scribes digest V1 #1 Reply-To: Sender: owner-scribes@castle.org Errors-To: owner-scribes@castle.org Precedence: bulk scribes digest Friday, January 23 1998 Volume 01 : Number 001 In this issue: [scribes]: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT - DIGEST NOW AVAILABLE Re: [scribes]: FW: [scribes] What about the words Re: [scribes]: What about the words Re: [scribes]: inexpensive gold/silver substitute Re: [scribes]: Question for Caid scribes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 21:40:12 -0800 (PST) From: Lee Damon Subject: [scribes]: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT - DIGEST NOW AVAILABLE I told you those tests would be worth it. :) For all of you who have been bugging/badgering/or otherwise politely asking me if there is a digest of this list available... the answer is finally "YES!". To s*bscribe to the new digest version, email majordomo@castle.org with s*bscribe scribes-digest uns*bscribe scribes in the body of the message. [replace the * with a "u" in the above commands!] (The "uns*bscribe" command will remove you from the regular list, so you don't get double messages.) I'm not sure how frequent the digests will be, though I know at least one a day will go out. It depends on how busy the list is. YIS, Lord Christopher Thomas nomad postmaster@castle.org - ------------ - Lee "nomad" Damon - \ play: nomad@castle.org or castle!nomad \ work: nomad@qualcomm.com \ /\ Seneschal, Castle PAUS. / \ "Celebrate Diversity" / \ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:44:43 EST From: FITCHYBEAR Subject: Re: [scribes]: FW: [scribes] What about the words In a message dated 98-01-23 13:49:46 EST, DawnV@edview.com writes: << Be careful of what you watch/listen to when you are calliging- A certain Landed Baroness of the Northshield was calliging a Middle Kingdom scroll while watching a seedy television program and finished the wording with: "In testimony whereof, we have set our hands and *sex*" >> Boy, have you got that right!!!!! I read the posting from Eowyn and 15 mins. later while calliging a scroll for an arts award I calliged "spinning" as the artform which should have been weaving..........I continued the layout of the artwork and in re-reading the scroll today discovered my mistake............ARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHH!-JimBear ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:44:44 EST From: FITCHYBEAR Subject: Re: [scribes]: What about the words In a message dated 98-01-23 15:03:41 EST, galega@nauticom.net writes: << it was on purpose!!! >> or was that porpoise?-JimBear( who can and will do twenty minutes on fish, bread or cheese puns at the drop of a hat) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:44:45 EST From: FITCHYBEAR Subject: Re: [scribes]: inexpensive gold/silver substitute In a message dated 98-01-23 15:17:49 EST, galega@nauticom.net writes: << (but a goob burnisher IS worth it's weight in gold ---) >> a goob burnisher??? is that what gives the Calontiri their polish?????-JimBear ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 01:59:33 EST From: EowynA Subject: Re: [scribes]: Question for Caid scribes In a message dated 1/23/98 9:21:44 PM, jmcewen@hawaii.edu wrote: > >Catriona again: >The question, O Caidan scribes, is does the shield *have* to be that size? > > Catriona The official answer is "Yes. " The unofficial answer is, "We are working to make that more flexible" , but lots of flack in that direction is unlikely to move the Scribe Armarius, and only make him cling to the current practice more tenaciously. On the other hand, I have seen many Caidan scrolls in which the arms are done smaller, and I do not believe he has rejected them. The real requirement is that the shield should be large enough to show the arms clearly and distinctly. Talk to him nicely beforehand, and exceptions are likely to be no problem. I really don't think he (or any previous Scribe Armarius) has actually measured the size of the arms display on scrolls. Eowyn Amberdrake, Caid (Melinda Sherbring, Los Angeles) ------------------------------ End of scribes digest V1 #1 ***************************